📰 What This Document Is 📜

This document is a DEFA14A (Definitive Additional Materials), which means it's a supplemental document issued by Ingles Markets, Incorporated to add context and arguments to its main Proxy Statement. In simple terms, it's Ingles' detailed, public defense and rebuttal to an activist shareholder group, Summer Road. 🥊 The filing explains that Ingles is engaged in a proxy contest, battling against Summer Road and its nominee, Rory Held, who are attempting to influence the company’s board of directors. Ingles is essentially asking current shareholders to read their side of the story, focusing heavily on company history, community bonds, and financial stability. 👉 Key Takeaway: This filing is not a straightforward report; it is a highly defensive, detailed advocacy piece designed to persuade current shareholders to vote against the opposition and for the company's existing governance structure and nominees.

🏢 What Ingles Markets Does 🛒

Ingles Markets is a regional supermarket chain and a community-based grocer operating primarily in North Carolina. Founded in 1963, the company emphasizes its deep ties to local communities, positioning itself as more than just a retail store. 🏡 The company's business model relies heavily on building and owning its physical locations, giving it a strong competitive advantage in real estate.

• Business Model Focus: Ingles emphasizes its local, community focus, which it argues is its main driver of success.
• Competitive Edge (Real Estate): Ingles holds a significant advantage by owning 84% of its store locations, giving it operational control and stability in real estate development—a strategic asset it argues is misunderstood by opponents. 👉 Why it Matters: Their reliance on local community trust means that any challenge to their reputation or governance is framed as a direct threat to their entire business model.

💰 Historical Financial Performance (FY2025) 📊

The filing includes a section comparing Ingles' historical performance metrics against its relevant peer groups, attempting to prove that the company is financially robust and performing well. 📈 Ingles provides several metrics, showing trends in sales growth and profitability compared to its peers (such as Albertsons, Kroger, and Ahold Delhaize).

• Net Sales: For the fiscal year 2025, Ingles reported Net Sales of $5.3 billion.
• Performance Benchmarks: Ingles' performance was shown to outperform peers on several core metrics:
  • Same Store Sales Increase: 4.8% (compared to 4.6% for peers).
  • Gross Profit as % of Sales: 3.3% (compared to 2.3% for peers).
  • Operating Margin average: 4.8% (compared to 3.4% for peers).
• Return on Invested Capital (ROIC): Ingles claims its ROIC was ~13% over a 10-year average, contrasting this sharply with Summer Road’s claimed rate of only 0.2%. 👉 Why it Matters: By presenting these numbers, Ingles is trying to counter a narrative that the company's fundamentals are declining, demonstrating that its financial health is strong and above the industry average.

🏛️ Corporate Governance & Board Structure 🛡️

This section is central to the entire proxy contest, detailing how Ingles is run and arguing that the current structure protects long-term value. 🧭 Ingles is framed as a three-generation family company, and the company uses a unique corporate structure (a "controlled company") to ensure the long-term interests of the founding family are prioritized.

• Long-Term Control: The Ingle family is cited as the largest shareholder, owning 23% of Ingles' outstanding shares, providing a significant, stable economic stake.
• Dual-Class Ownership: The company's structure dictates that new independent directors can only be elected by Class A shareholders, while Class B shares (held by the founding family) have no voting rights. Ingles argues this protects the company from short-term, activist pressures.
• Recommended Action: The Ingles Board unanimously recommends that shareholders vote “FOR” the company's director candidates, Rebekah Lowe and Dwight Jacobs, using the WHITE universal proxy card. 👉 Why it Matters: The core message here is that the corporate structure itself is designed to stabilize the company and ensure that long-term, patient investments outweigh short-sighted, quarterly concerns.

👨‍💼 Management and Executive Leadership 🧑‍💼

Ingles addresses the perceived criticism that the company's management compensation is excessive or inflationary, reinforcing the stability and commitment of its leadership team. 🤝 The filing emphasizes the experience of the board and leadership team, pointing out their decades of involvement in the grocery industry and deep connections to the communities they serve.

• Compensation Stability: They pointed out that for the years 2024 and 2025, the total reported compensation for the Chairman and CEO remained flat, with no increases from 2023 pay levels.
• Alignment: They state that the compensation structure is designed to align pay with market benchmarks and rewards the Chairman's "active engagement and significant day-to-day contributions," while also accounting for the significant existing equity held by the founding family. 👉 Why it Matters: By pointing to flat compensation for two years, Ingles attempts to directly counter the claim that the company is increasing payouts while performance is declining.

🌐 The Conflict with Summer Road and Rory Held 🛑

This is the heart of the proxy fight, where Ingles systematically dismantles the credibility and motives of its opponent. 🥊 The argument is that Summer Road (the family office of the Sacklers) and its nominee, Rory Held, do not understand the grocery industry and are proposing financially destructive strategies.

• Lack of Expertise: Ingles points out that Rory Held's professional experience is limited to his time at investment firms and his only public board service was at Peak Resorts, which he served as a Sackler Representative.
• Strategic Flaw: Summer Road advocates for aggressive capital returns, but Ingles argues that sustainable value in the grocery industry is created through constant operational reinvestment, not just financial payouts.
• Misunderstanding the Market: Ingles argues that Summer Road fails to recognize that owning real estate is vital for long-term growth in the grocery sector, suggesting that separating real estate would be "value destructive." 👉 Why it Matters: Ingles’ strategy is not just to win votes, but to frame the opponent as fundamentally unqualified and professionally dangerous to the company's long-term viability.

💸 The Allegations Regarding the Sacklers' Reputation 💔

This is arguably the most forceful and repeated theme of the filing, using ethical and reputational concerns to challenge the opponent's integrity. 🚨 Ingles heavily leverages the history of the Sackler family and Purdue Pharma to warn shareholders that associating with them poses significant reputational risk to Ingles.

• Opioid Crisis Link: The filing cites historical context showing the Sacklers' connection to Purdue Pharma and the opioid epidemic, noting that the family was required to pay $7.4 billion due to their alleged role in the crisis.
• Reputational Harm: The company highlights that even the opposition's own counsel has testified that the Sackler name is associated with "calls for boycotts" and the loss of business relationships, including the termination of banking ties by seven financial institutions.
• "Dirty Money": Ingles repeatedly emphasizes that the wealth Summer Road has accrued, including investments in Peak Resorts, was derived from money that the company argues was "not honestly earned" through the opioid trade. 👉 Why it Matters: By tying the proxy fight to a major public health and ethical crisis, Ingles elevates the debate from mere corporate governance to one of public trust and community ethics, which is extremely potent for local grocers.

🗓️ Summary of Investment Thesis (Ingles’ Position) ✅

The overall message to the investor is clear: Ingles is strong, stable, and locally rooted; the opposition is financially motivated, ethically questionable, and structurally incompetent. 💯

• The Ingle Family: The local Ingle family's long-term commitment, spanning 60 years, is presented as the stabilizing force.
• Value Creation: Ingles believes sustainable value comes from operational longevity and reinvestment in its physical assets, not merely from aggressive capital returns.
• Investor Recommendation: Ingles urges shareholders to recognize the company's enduring mission and vote to maintain the current direction and leadership structure. 👉 Why it Matters: The filing forces the reader to weigh deep local institutional knowledge and community trust against complex, distant, and financially aggressive investment strategies.

📞 Key Actions and Contacts 📩

For shareholders seeking more information or details on their voting rights, the company provides specific instructions and contacts. 🗺️

• Voting Mechanism: Shareholders are explicitly urged to use ONLY the Company’s WHITE universal proxy card. The filing warns that using any other proxy card will revoke prior voting instructions.
• Official Filings: The definitive proxy statement was filed with the SEC on April 1, 2026.
• Investor Relations Contact: For more information, shareholders can visit the investor relations website under the “Corporate” tab at www.ingles-markets.com or contact Barbara Arnold.

---

🧠 The Analogy

The proxy fight is like trying to sell a beloved, old family farm (Ingles). The current owners (the Ingles family) argue that the farm’s value comes from generations of careful tending, building deep community roots, and maintaining the physical structures (the real estate). The outside investors (Summer Road) are like wealthy outsiders who show up with a massive bank account and suggest immediately selling the profitable assets, maximizing a quick profit by taking out all the cash. The Ingles side argues that this quick payout will starve the farm of the necessary operating capital, eventually leading it to crumble.

🧩 Final Takeaway

Ingles markets is mounting a sophisticated defense, arguing that its local history, physical real estate ownership, and long-term community relationships are more valuable than the aggressive financial strategies proposed by its opponents, whose connections to the opioid crisis have severely compromised their reputation.